Different Types of Transit, Or Maybe Our Train Won’t Be Great

Slate’s Matthew Yglesias recently wrote a fantastic piece about how different kinds of public transit create different types of communities. He points out that in communities like Boston or Brooklyn, mass transit has created dense, high-value, walkable communities. In the D.C. area, however, one transit line treats train travel more like car travel by emphasizing the speed of the trains and by spreading out stations. In other words, it focuses on how quickly it gets people from point A to point B.

Yglesias’ point is that a federal law may soon allow a different approach to transit, but the distinction he makes is an incredibly important one: some public transit focuses on intra-community travel and walkability, while other transit looks at how to move people quickly over long distances. Both kinds of transit are important, of course, but Yglesias aptly argues that in order to create valuable, walkable communities transit stations need to be located close to one another and surrounded by dense structures. In other words, intra-community travel is what really has the biggest impact on a community.

Unfortunately, Provo’s coming commuter rail is more like the D.C. example Yglesias uses. The stations will be spaced far apart with the emphasis on getting people from one distant community to another. That’s obviously better than car transit, but it won’t necessarily make a major dent in the car-to-resident ratio. Yglesias’ argument also suggests that transit like Provo’s won’t necessarily have a significant revitalizing effect on the surrounding area downtown Provo because it isn’t designed to facilitate intra-communty walking or density.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under commuting, Development, Downtown, driving, neighborhood, Provo, travel

2 responses to “Different Types of Transit, Or Maybe Our Train Won’t Be Great

  1. Rose

    I can see that. DC has both the revitalizing kind and the get from point A to point B kind, and in my experience, there was a big difference. Part of that was that many of the Point A to Point B train stations are really set up for people to drive to and park their cars rather than walk. However, right in the city, the thriving areas are usually centered around metro stations. Some of the stations were placed there because they were already thriving areas, but some of them have grown more because of the stations. Maybe Provo needs the long distance train first before getting the more local kind.

    • Yeah, I agree that we probably just need the one before we get the other. Provo is much younger than DC and much smaller, so hopefully was we grow we’ll see both kinds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s