A Wilde Ride Part 1: My Meeting With A City Planner

I recently had the opportunity to meet with Brent Wilde, Provo’s assistant community development director.

Brent and I spent some time discussing downtown Provo, and I think we both agree that it’s an exciting time for the city. We specifically discussed transportation, density, walkability and the coming Intermodal Hub — which I often refer to somewhat inaccurately as the “train station.”

Here are a few highlights from our conversation:

• The city continues to plan for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), though all the funding needed to make this happen has not yet been secured. I don’t know if there is a specific timeline for this project yet, but Brent mentioned it will connect the train station to other parts of the valley. You can find routes and other information via the link.

• There is interest in turning 100 West into a pedestrian corridor between downtown and the train station. Brent mention that the area could benefit from infill. He also said the city would consider other other efforts to aid walkability, such as creating a median in the street, though no specifics have been agreed on.

• There is interest in building a pedestrian bridge over train tracks on Freedom Blvd and 600 South. Unfortunately, this bridge would be very expensive.

• The city is looking to add residential spaces to downtown.

All in all, it was a fascinating meeting and one that heightened my appreciation for the excellent work being done right now in the city. However, Brent also mentioned to me resident demand could lead to more single family homes in historic downtown neighborhoods. That could be a good thing, but it could also be disastrous. I’ll discuss that topic in more detail in my next post.



Filed under community, Development, Downtown, neighborhood

10 responses to “A Wilde Ride Part 1: My Meeting With A City Planner

  1. Pingback: A Wilde Ride Part 2: Concerns About Downtown Density | (pro(vo)cation)

  2. I’m surprised that Provo is considering the pedestrian corridor on 1st West instead of Freedom Blvd. If they chose Freedom instead, not only would they not have to build an expensive skywalk across Freedom to get to 1st West, but they would also be creating a walkway that doesn’t take pedestrians out of their way. It would route pedestrians right in front of the convention center, and just a block from Covey Center, Nu Skin and the Temple. Otherwise, I could see people that are walking to Covey or the Convention Center just bypassing the 1st west corridor and walking on Freedom instead. Although Freedom has sidewalks right now, it could use a bit of a facelift before it’s the pedestrian gateway to downtown. Just my thoughts.

    Thanks for the great and frequent posts.

  3. Yeah, I was also surprised by that. Freedom seemed like the natural choice to me, but the idea was so early in the planning stages that I don’t think they’ve settled on anything yet. I could see them going back to freedom though.

  4. Pingback: How to Talk to Your Provo-Hating Friends Part 2 | (pro(vo)cation)

  5. Pingback: Is Closing 100 South for the Tabernacle Temple a Good Idea? | (pro(vo)cation)

  6. Pingback: Freedom Boulevard: An Epic Fail | (pro(vo)cation)

  7. Pingback: The Siren Song of the Pedestrian Mall | (pro(vo)cation)

  8. Pingback: The Future of the Train Station | (pro(vo)cation)

  9. Pingback: Lessons from Denver’s Semi-Troubled Pedestrian Mall | (pro(vo)cation)

  10. Pingback: A Bridge to (Almost) Nowhere | About Town

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s