Solutions for Utah County’s Malls

I’ve argued before that Utah County’s malls appear to be dying. I also may be the only person who was disappointed when Sears recently announced it was staying in the Provo Towne Center mall; my feeling was that it simply delayed the inevitable, possibly giving the community a false and detrimental sense of security along the way.

But if malls are dying — and Orem’s 66 percent anchor vacancy rate is just the most local evidence that they are — what can communities do with them?

Like many malls, University Mall in Orem has lost major tenants in recent years.

Earlier this week, The New York Times reported on a man in San Antonio who had one possible solution. According to the article, Graham Weston saw his community’s dead mall and decided to make it his tech company’s headquarters. And it worked:

Today, his idea to move his company to the very mall where he got the blue ruffle tuxedo he wore to his junior prom seems more innovative than insane, with 3,200 Rackspace employees keystroking in cubicles set up where retailers like J. C. Penny, Zales, Casual Corner and Piercing Pagoda used to be. The project suggests that there might be hidden opportunities in the nation’s glut of dead and dying malls and represents one of the country’s largest and quirkiest recycling efforts.

The article goes on to point out that malls are indeed struggling, but that Graham invested heavily in customizing his mall-office. Now, additional development has sprung up around the site:

Shops and restaurants now encircle the mall, hoping to lure Rackspace employees, whose average salary is $69,000, far above the local average of $37,000. Stratford Land, a real estate development company based in Dallas, purchased 111 acres nearby in January, promising to build restaurants, shops and multifamily housing for Rackers.

This exact strategy may not work in Utah County because there likely isn’t a billionaire looking for a massive office space.

But the point is that communities should think creatively about what goes into a mall. When an anchor leaves, it doesn’t necessarily have to be replaced by another anchor. Instead, mall operators could consider repurposing the space as housing or offices. In reality, such projects would benefit everyone, including the mall itself, by building more customers into the immediate area. Malls could even become more authentic, vibrant developments as they evolve naturally in the market place.

When Nordstrom pulled out of this mall earlier this year, it was left with just one anchor, Macy’s. Rather than spend years searching for another anchor, why not convert the Nordstrom space into something entirely new?

The result, at least for Utah County’s malls, could be something similar to Salt Lake’s City Creek, but at a tiny fraction of the cost and in a less fabricated-all-at-once kind of way. In reality, there’s no reason to build new, mixed use development to replace malls when current development can be adapted more readily.

The possibilities are endless, but the point is that it may be time to stop thinking of malls as “malls” and more as potential developments, or even neighborhoods. The alternative is watching them languish, die, and be razed.



Filed under Development, economics

2 responses to “Solutions for Utah County’s Malls

  1. I like the idea of converting the anchors into residential space. It seems like it would be somewhat easy to divide up. It is sprinkled, there is an elevator, it has parking already near and opens up to mixed-use space.

    Greenspace for dogs/kids/recreation could be added were parking is subtracted. More residential units in the form of townhomes or rowhouses could infill some parking creating new streets in some cases.

    My general beef with malls is what they represent from the jump. They are generally built miles from towns in most cases, which has deteriorated the core and once lively districts. All the crap that followed the mall in sprawling out further adds to the underlying problem. There’s a lot to learn from malls and big box leftovers, but readapting and breathing new life in them only continues the problem in many instances. I will agree though that some can be beneficial.

  2. Pingback: Malls: Another One Bites the Dust | (pro(vo)cation)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s