Mo’ People Mo’ Money

Continuing the series on wealth and city success (see previous posts here and here), I decided to look at the number of people per square mile, or population density, in five cities. Specifically, I was curious if other cities in Provo’s class had higher or lower densities.

What I found was an apparent correlation between density and income:

In the graph above, density is plotted along the Y axis while income is plotted on the X axis. As is clear, the higher the density the higher the median income. Here are the actual numbers:

This data — which isn’t surprising — offers clear procedural guidance: if Provo wants a thriving economy and downtown, it should increase density. The standard justification for that argument is that adding people means more customers for local businesses. That’s true, but as this data shows those people will also earn more as they cluster into tighter areas. In other words, higher density provides the duel benefits of more customers with more buying power.

Of course, I’m not arguing that density by itself causes higher income. And there are plenty of high density-low wage places in the world. Instead, I’m saying that in a city like Provo there appears to be a correlation between density and wealth. Embracing density also clearly won’t turn medium-sized American cities into third-world slums.

Census data shows a correlation between density and median income. That means Provo needs to do more than add buildings like this downtown, as wonderful as they are.

Perhaps an analogy — which I adapt liberally from Jon Huntsman’s view on climate change — might be helpful: Imagine having cancer and hearing a doctor say “everyone who tried this one treatment survived and everyone who didn’t died.” Would you try that treatment?

That’s sort of what is going on here; cities resembling Provo that try more density are generally prospering. At a fundamental level it’s very simple.

Thankfully, Provo is adding density in downtown. The neighborhood planning efforts are also helping residents understand the problems with sprawl-inducing policies like parking minimums. All said, Provo is doing well.

Still though, we could be doing even more. Sure, there are residential projects going into downtown, but where is the infill in historic neighborhoods? Where are the pocket developments in the more suburban areas? Where are the sweeping code changes that allow for actively encourage denser development? In the end, my friends, baby steps aren’t going to cut it in the neighborhoods.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Development, economics

5 responses to “Mo’ People Mo’ Money

  1. Josh

    Or does density lead to or result from increased property value. If dense cities are more expensive to live in, then it may be that lower income individuals are unable to live in such places. So they may not be increasing wealth, but driving out poverty. But we do know that density leads to economic activity and as such should create wealth. I wonder what the correlation looks like between median housing cost and density.

  2. Pingback: Brown Out: Why Are So Many Suburbs Bland? | (pro(vo)cation)

  3. Pingback: Maps and Income: More on Why Provo Feels Less Vibrant | (pro(vo)cation)

  4. Pingback: Density Is Needed Everywhere In Provo | (pro(vo)cation)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s