Category Archives: tree

The Best Christmas Tree Stand in Provo

Last year, I randomly stumbled on Baum’s Christmas trees. Then Saturday, Laura and I made visiting Baum’s a tradition when we picked up our second tree in as many years. And personally, I think the tree we bought this year is the best one we’ve found since we’ve been together.

Baum's Christmas tree stand, which is located in a front yard in the hills behind DI.

Baum’s Christmas tree stand, which is located in a front yard in the hills behind DI.

I’ve included my original post in its entirety below. To that I’ll just add that while Baum’s may not be the only family-run Christmas tree operation out there, it’s still a fairly unique place where you can talk to the actual person who cut the tree down. And while the trees themselves may not be local, the rest of the operation is so it’s better for the local economy. As a result, I once again highly recommend Baum’s. Since my original post, Baum’s has also been featured in a Daily Herald article, which includes more information.

Here’s the original post:

If you’re looking for a Christmas Tree in Utah Valley, allow me to recommend Baum Christmas Trees. It’s a Christmas tree lot located in Mr. Baum’s front yard, at 1650 N. 1250 W. To get there, head north along the street behind D.I., turn left at the first light, follow the road as it curves around, and turn right at the appropriate street (first or second street you come to).

Baum Christmas Trees is charming and quaint in a way that parking lot venders never could be. Not only are you walking around on someone’s front yard, but there’s one of those little, pre-fab waterfalls. Also, the Baum family is very appropriately named, as “baum” means “tree” in German.

According to Mr. Baum — I didn’t get his first name, though the tag on our tree says R. Ladell Baum — he cuts all the trees himself, mostly in Utah and Wyoming. His son told us that the family has been doing it for 40 years, and used to sell about 2,000 trees. Today, they sell around 1,000.

And lest you think that this place is too Mom and Pop to have a decent selection, I assure you that there are trees for all tastes. We got a $28 tree that is probably just under 6 feet. There were a lot of taller trees and some smaller trees. They come in all the typical breeds (species? varieties? what do you call different types of pine trees?), and can be flocked as well.

As for us, we’re both pleased with the tree we found and are glad we accidentally stumbled upon Baum’s while driving around one day.


1 Comment

Filed under buy local, local, tree

Provo in the Snow

Snow has always seemed like the most reverent of weather phenomena, at least when it falls gradually in gentle winds. Not only is nearly silent, but it muffles other sounds. And in a city, it glows too.

Early Saturday morning I decided to take pictures of the storm blanketing Provo. I left my house around 3:30 am, then went back around 4 am and woke Laura up. We wandered around downtown until about 6 am. Every few minutes, we heard low pops and then saw huge falling tree limbs. At one point I tried, unsuccessfully, to help a guy push his car out of an ice patch. And when the snowflakes became large, they cast shadows in the street light, making the ground look fuzzy like TV static.

The pictures in the gallery below show what downtown Provo looks like in the middle of a snow storm, in the middle of the night, when there are no people out. Enjoy (click to enlarge).*

And here’s a video that I took mostly to capture the sound of water running into a ditch:

*As I’m sure is apparent, I’m not a professional photographer nor were these photos taken with professional equipment. They also haven’t been photoshopped.


Filed under Downtown, Provo, tree

Cultivating a Tree Culture

Writing for PlaceMakers, Scott Doyon recently argued that among the seven highly useful keys to a stronger community is a commitment to a strong tree canopy. However, Doyon notes that many communities approach this issue the wrong way:

[…] communities concerned about their tree canopy deal with its preservation through ordinances that prevent tree removal. Not to say that such ordinances are categorically wrong, mind you. Just that, by focusing mostly on trees at the tail end of their lives — the ones that get the most notice and inspire the greatest affection — they steal attention from what should be the greater goal.

Doyon goes on to argue that preservation efforts are unnecessarily divisive. Instead, he suggests that communities should focus on replanting because replanting efforts add to the canopy and don’t drive a wedge between differing factions. Kaid Benfield also later pointed out that the focus shouldn’t be about preservation verses tree removal. Like Doyon, he emphasizes ongoing planting.

An emphasis on replanting trees helps cities evolve without battles over tree preservation.

These points are especially significant for a growing city like Provo because trees can sometimes provide indirect incentives to build sprawl; if no trees can be cut down the only place to build is in undeveloped land where there are either no trees or no tree preservationists. As I’ve recently advocated building more housing in Provo’s existing neighborhoods, for example, one of the most common objections I’ve heard is that doing so would require cutting down trees.

And it would.

But an ongoing emphasis on replanting — combined with gradual building — would mean ongoing replenishment of Provo’s significant tree canopy. That would open the door for more positive infill, along with more trees.

Cities that focus on replenishing their tree canopies will have the flexibility to handle growth — even if it means losing trees here and there.


Filed under community, tree

What Houses in the Streets Might Look Like

Earlier this week, I suggested that Provo sell off the edges of too-wide streets so they can be developed as housing. I stand by that idea because I think it would improve quality of life for everyone, because it would raise money, and because it would save millions in tax dollars.

But I may not have articulated the idea very well. I’ve particularly begun to regret sharing that photo of the MOMA exhibit because while it took this concept to its logical conclusion, that isn’t a conclusion that could, or should, ever be reached.

Instead, this idea is a way to reduce paved, expensive areas. If done right, it wouldn’t significantly reduce the amount of green space or the number of trees.

In an effort to convey what I’m suggesting, I’ve created the image below. I wanted to use my own street, but trees in the satellite image obscured the view. So instead, I used a street near my house. And bear with me; I made this using a very rudimentary free drawing program. Still, it’s more or less what I’m talking about:

Street space becomes housing in this picture. You’ll probably need to click on this picture to see much detail.

The blue boxes represent possible lots for homes. They look small, but the house to the left is a mansion and one of the largest buildings in the neighborhood. I estimate that these “lots” — which, again, are crudely drawn — are about 20 feet deep and almost as wide. Depending on circumstance, they could also be made bigger. I’ve been casually researching small lot homes lately and I’ve found many incredible designs that would fit into these spaces.

The yellow lines represent sidewalks. I’ve argued over and over that Provo needs to break up its huge blocks with more pedestrian paths. This idea wouldn’t exactly do that, but it would increase walkability by offering pedestrians multiple routes.

The green strip to the right of the lots represents a new, grassy parkway.

And finally, the purple circles represent trees (sorry, I had already used green). Note that this proposal would require cutting down two trees, but would result in planting nine new ones. In my book, that’s a major improvement.

A few other things: with the exception of the trees, this entire proposal takes place on city land. The large lawn of the existing home is preserved and the reduction of green space is generally very minimal.

This proposal also takes up less than half the street. Look at the car in the picture; the street is still wide enough for at least three, and maybe four, vehicles. However, with a narrowed street cars would tend to slow down, increasing safety.

Finally, some people might look at this idea and say “but now the street is irregular! It gets narrower at one end!”

To that concern I say “so what?” Most of my favorite places in the world have irregular streets. The speed-related benefits of a narrower street would likely extend beyond the immediate vicinity of the new development, and if property owners up the block consented this concept could be extended. If they didn’t, the street could just stay narrower on one end. No big deal. And who knows, 200 years from now that irregularity might provide a spot for a nice little square or cafe like the one I recently saw in Tangier. Ultimately, irregularity is a benefit of this plan.

This idea also doesn’t turn Provo into Manhattan or Europe. It simply replaces a bit of street with a few small homes and cottages for families. There’s still green space, trees, and full street access for existing homes.

I’ve been wanting to write about this concept for months. I hesitated, however, because I wasn’t aware of a city that had actually tried it. But as my original post indicates, Vancouver is making it happen. The street grid in Vancouver is clearly different than the one in Provo, but this idea absolutely could be adapted and the picture above is just one possible way to do that.


Filed under Development, neighborhood, tree

Catalyzing Urban Fruit Production

Urban food production is easy, cheap, and fun. A frequent topic on this blog (here, here and here, for example), it can provide healthy food for the community, particularly those who may not already have it. Moreover, cities like Provo already expend resources on community landscaping, meaning planting more fruit trees would be almost free.

So why aren’t we growing more food in our parks and public spaces? Why isn’t urban fruit production a bigger part of the cultural and social environment in Utah?

I don’t know the answer, but my colleague Mark Johnston recently wrote about a man who is making this concept a reality in Provo. According to the article, Loren Boddy goes around picking fruit from his neighbors trees, then distributes it to the community:

During morning runs he once took when living in Springville six years ago, Boddy began noticing how much fruit went unused and ended up rotting beneath the trees in his neighborhood. When he asked, the homeowners were more than happy to let him come and pick all he wanted for himself. Soon he was enjoying fresh grapes, apples, peaches and one year even gathered 50 pounds of cracked walnuts, all for free.

Boddy also apparently uses his connections in the LDS Church to help distribute the produce he gleans.

The story is illuminative for several reasons:

1. It takes a community to supply the various skill sets needed to capitalize on urban fruit production. In other words, urban agriculture works best with a lot of people who share responsibilities and divide labor.

2. Utah communities already have the social structure in place to organize and divide labor to make urban agriculture more viable.

That second point is especially significant. Provo in particular ranks highly for volunteerism, has strong religious and cultural ties, and can grow fruit. In that context, there’s no reason those factors shouldn’t converge into a social effort — however formal or not — to apply urban fruit production for the community good. It seems the only thing lacking is a catalyst.

An apple tree in a Provo park. Why aren’t there more apple trees in more parks?

Leave a comment

Filed under apples, Food, tree

The Next Phase of Expanding the Urban Farm

Provo is doing a great job incorporating edible plants into urban landscaping, but apparently Todmorden, England, is doing even better. In the TED talk below — which is quite entertaining, by the way — Pam Warhurst discusses how her city has planted fruits and vegetables in just about every place possible: roadsides, police stations, and even the cemetery.

Warhurst is rightfully proud of what her city is doing, as well as the reasons behind the edible development. As she says, “we’re not doing it because we’re bored, we’re doing it because we want to start a revolution.”

More specifically, Warhurst argues that food appears to be a common language that cuts across cultures. She also points out that she and others just went out and changed the community, without funding or permission. It’s an inspiring story and this post from Polis provides a more detailed rundown on Warhurst’s argument.

More than 1,500 miles south, I was recently fortunate to witness a different but similarly powerful example of edible landscaping.

In numerous towns around Spain, the streets are lined with orange trees. It’s a tradition that has existed for hundreds of years, and I’m told that when the trees are in bloom entire neighborhoods are filled with the aroma of orange blossoms. Orange trees also are popular because in Spain’s climate, they don’t lose their leaves and thus provide year-round shade.

Orange trees shading a public square in Seville, Spain.

Orange trees line the street in front of a Baroque church.

Orange trees on a fairly average street in Granada, Spain.

As is apparent, the orange trees pictured above are not massive. In fact, they’re pruned to produce fruit — unlike many urban fruit trees in the U.S. that are pruned to reduce yields — and are replaced when they get too old. Though every spot in these pictures may not have always had orange trees, the general tradition is very old.

The oranges from these trees are not particularly edible. (I’ve heard that tourists like to try them anyway, though I did not.) But they are productive, yielding material for British-style orange marmalade, perfume, and many other things. In other words, these trees do produce a usable crop.

These trees, as well as Warhurst’s examples from Todmorden, show the power that urban agriculture can have as well as an obvious next step for a city like Provo. The understanding and appreciation of this idea already clearly exists in Provo, all that lacks is a little more effort to make our existing landscapes a little more edible.

1 Comment

Filed under environment, Food, travel, tree

Trees, Heat, and the Urban Canopy

It’s hot outside and everyday when I call fire officials  — I cover wildfires among other things for work — they tell me it’s going to stay hot. And while the record breaking heat can be a pain, it also emphasizes the massive benefit of city trees. As I have mentioned in previous posts, city trees significantly cut down on energy and irrigation costs. They also cut down on crime and offer free food.

Pittsburgh apparently understands those benefits better than most cities. This recent Post-Gazette story describes the city’s efforts to enrich the urban tree canopy in order to reap more economic and environmental benefits:

The master plan reports the city has more than 2.5 million trees that sequester 13,900 tons of carbon dioxide a year, saved residents $3 million in energy bills last year and remove 519 tons of pollution at a savings of $3.6 million a year. Street trees alone diverted 41.8 million gallons of stormwater last year.

The plan calls for a 20 percent increase in the size of Pittsburgh’s tree canopy over the next 20 years. That’s no small task considering the city already has 2.5 million trees.

Interestingly, the article notes that many of Pittsburgh’s trees are located in more affluent neighborhoods. Though Provo is much smaller than Pittsburgh, I’d argue that something similar is true across Utah and Salt Lake Counties. That suggests that richer people can afford to plant and tend trees, but it may also indicate that trees are a way to increase individual and neighborhood-wide property values.

Unfortunately, trees in northern Utah will almost certainly need more irrigation than trees in Pittsburgh. Lately, I’ve also seen quite a few young trees that have died from apparent lack of water. But in many cases property owners are irrigating anyway to maintain lawns. And in any case, the benefits trees have on cities are so significant that, like Pittsburgh, Provo also could benefit from an overt effort to increase it’s urban canopy.

Some parts of Provo are filled with trees, but like Pittsburgh, Provo could use an overall increase in it’s urban canopy.

Leave a comment

Filed under environment, tree