What City Creek Could Have Been

Utah Stories recently reviewed its coverage of City Creek, aptly pointing out that most media in Salt Lake City never bothered asking any critical and important questions about the LDS Church’s $2 billion mall.

City Creek more or less got a free pass from most Salt Lake City media, despite the fact that its impact on the city is complex, to say the least.

The article also charts what I think of as Salt Lake City’s “mall bubble”: every few years the city erects a new facility, which then puts old malls and local shops alike out of business. It’s a bizarre cycle, but one that Provo and other cities have mostly managed to avoid. Hopefully articles like this one help dissuade people from supporting more mall-like development.

What stands out most to me, however, is the article’s emphasis how malls damage the local business community. As I’ve written before, buying from locally owned shops channels money back into the local economy. On the other hand, buying from large chains funnels money to distant corporate headquarters. It’s such an obvious process that I have a hard time understanding any city’s willingness to peg economic development to a mall like City Creek; in the end, there might be a bit more skim in the form of sales tax, but overall there’s less milk to go around.

If the LDS Church and civic leaders had really wanted to revitalize Salt Lake City, they consequently should have looked for opportunities to invest in the local economy. They should have worked to do something more complex than just than add a few hundred medium- to low-paying retail and management jobs. They should have been looking to diversify and broaden the economy.

There are many ways to do that, but if I had been calling the shots I’d have invested all $2 billion in startups and business development. Think about it: the church could have invested a million dollars apiece in 2,000 startups. That’s a staggering figure, though obviously the money could have been distributed to fewer businesses and with more complexity. The church also could have used the money to bring existing businesses to the city.

In any case, with 2,000 new startups only a tiny percentage would have needed to succeed in order to generate thousands of good, career-track jobs. Salt Lake City could have eclipsed other centers of technology, medicine, or anything else. More malls might have eventually sprung up due to demand, rather than due to a wealthy supplier.

The opportunity has passed for Salt Lake City, but for cities like Provo that are looking for economic development, the lesson is an important one. Though a shiny new mall is exciting and fun, just a little bit of delayed gratification and smart investing can result in vastly superior rewards.

Imagine if the money spent on this mall had instead been spent to seed hundreds, or even thousands, of new businesses in the Salt Lake area.



Filed under Development, Downtown, economics, Mormon

14 responses to “What City Creek Could Have Been

  1. Nathan

    The more I think about it, real Economic Development is creating an environment for a dynamic job market, not retail. An Atlantic Cities article the other day stated that Cabela’s and Bass Pro Shop have received a combined 2.2 Billion in incentives the past 15 years from local communities. That’s a lot of foregone investment to parks, libraries, transportation infrastructure. and other amenities.

    • Agreed. It seems like retail should be a result of a dynamic job market, with lots of people with jobs creating demand for stores. But for some reason developers seem to have it backward, with retail supposedly leading the way to more development. It doesn’t make sense to me.

  2. Coke Drinker

    A mall like City Creek benefits people not because it creates jobs, but because it offers Salt Lake City residents the opportunity to buy nice things. Value is not all about job creation.

    • Fair enough, though I’d still say that any enterprise that funnels money to an outside economy AND that could be provided by a local versions is doing its region a disservice. SLC residents could have purchased nice things from a local provider, which ultimately would have been more beneficial.

      Also, without job creation there is no economic growth. “Value” is an economic concept, so it requires economic consideration.

  3. Pingback: Best August Posts | (pro(vo)cation)

  4. Pingback: Malls: Another One Bites the Dust | (pro(vo)cation)

  5. Pingback: CRAP ALERT!*: New Mall Opens in Lehi | (pro(vo)cation)

  6. Pingback: Seating Examples in Salt Lake | (pro(vo)cation)

  7. Pingback: Growing Startups, Spanish Style | (pro(vo)cation)

  8. Pingback: The Salt Lake Temple Hasn’t Revitalized Salt Lake City | (pro(vo)cation)

  9. Pingback: Build Neighborhoods Out of Malls | (pro(vo)cation)

  10. Carrie

    I’m disappointed that, in this location that represents the heart of the stunningly unique historical and cultural phenomenon that is Salt Lake City, the highest act we can aspire to is buyin’ $h*t. Even in its retail heyday, Gateway offered the Clark Planetarium, movie theaters, Discovery Gateway (the children’s museum,) and encouraged warm weather water play at the Olympic fountain. Even if you’re just there to pick up a dress at Old Navy, there’s always a nod toward the fact that it’s a good thing for people to be outside, away from their homes, in a community setting that revolves around something other than retail. City Creek lacks that vibe entirely.

  11. Pingback: Can malls thrive as event centers? | About Town

  12. Pingback: If we want more art, we need a holistic approach | About Town

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s